1 / 3
Caption Text
2 / 3
Caption Two
3 / 3
Caption Three margin testing

Thursday, October 28, 2010

The Web Page Width Dilemma

http://www.alteredimpressions.com/Usability101/Web_Page_Width_Dilemma.php

With so many different resolutions (800x600, 1024x768, etc.), browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, etc.), and platforms (Windows, Mac, Mobile ,etc.) in use, it is very difficult to design a page that looks good (or at least looks the same) in all configurations.

To design a page that looks good with most configurations, let's start by defining our main objective:  we must never force a user to scroll horizontally.  In other words, our page must always fit within the available screen width.  This would suggest that we have to design our page for the lowest common denominator.

So let's look at the stats

January 2010
Resolution % of Total
1280x102418.2 %
1280x800 17.3 %
1440x90010.5 %
1680x1050 10.0 %
1920x12004.6 %
1366x768 3.6 %
1920x10802.3 %
1152x864 2.1 %
1600x12001.4 %
1280x768 1.2 %
Other4.8 %

Get the latest in stat at w3schools.com

Ready for our next decision

Should we design a fixed-width page, or should we specify the width of our page in percentage terms?

fixed-width: There are pros and cons for both.  The main advantage of a fixed-width page is that the layout will always remain as you intended, even when viewed at higher resolutions.  The main disadvantage is that users with larger screens, set at higher resolutions, will not be able to fully utilize them, and will instead see large, unused blocks of space around your page.

percentage terms: The advantage of establishing our page width in percentage terms, as 100%, is that the page will adjust itself to the resolution of the screen.  This is called a "liquid page design".  The main benefit of this method is that all the available screen real estate will be utilized.  The disadvantage is that the layout of your page will change, and users may find it uncomfortable to read the extremely wide sentences that will result when higher resolutions are used.

If you decide optimize your page for 1024x768, and then decide to follow the fixed-width page method, you must take into account that not all the 1024 pixels will be available (some of them will be used by the browser to display the scrollbar and other "browser chrome").  To accommodate most browsers and platforms, specify your page width at a maximum of 960 pixels

If you decide to specify your page at 100% width, you won't have that problem, since it will adjust automatically to the available width.  Just make sure that your page looks best at 1024x768, and that the layout doesn't change much when you view your page at 1280x1024.

 Content provided by Altered Impressions - making websites that work!

Switching Tabs In Eclipse

http://blog.objectmentor.com/articles/2006/12/22/switching-tabs-in-eclipse

There is also Ctrl+E to see a list of open editors (works kind of like quick outline); CTRL+F6, to toogle between editors similar to windows ALT+TAB; CTRL+F7, to toogle between open views and CTRL+F8 to toogle between recent perspectives.

China claims supercomputer crown

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11644252
28 October 2010 Last updated at 11:14 ET BBC News

Tianhe supercomputer, Nvidia

The Tianhe-1A supercomputer is about 50% faster than its closest rival.

China has claimed the top spot on the list of the world's supercomputers.

The title has gone to China's Tianhe-1A supercomputer that is capable of carrying out more than 2.5 thousand trillion calculations a second.

To reach such high speeds the machine draws on more than 7,000 graphics processors and 14,000 Intel chips.

The claim to be the fastest machine on the planet has been ratified by the Top 500 Organisation which maintains a list of the most powerful machines.

High power

China's Tianhe-1A (Milky Way) has taken over the top spot from America's XT5 Jaguar at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee that can carry out only 1.75 petaflops per second. One petaflop is the equivalent of 1,000 trillion calculations per second.

The news about the machine broke just before the publication of the biennial Top 500 Supercomputer list which ranks the world's most powerful machines.

Prof Jack Dongarra from the University of Tennessee, one of the computer scientists who helps to compile the list, said China's claim was legitimate.

"This is all true," he told BBC News. "I was in China last week and talked with the designers, saw the system, and verified the results."

He added: "I would say it's 47% faster than the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's machine, 1.7 Pflops (ORNL system) to 2.5 Pflops (Chinese system)."

Tianhe-1A is unusual in that it unites thousands of Intel processors with thousands of graphics cards made by Nvidia.

The chips inside graphics cards are typically made up of small arithmetical units that can carry out simple sums very quickly. By contrast, Intel chips are typically used to carry out more complicated mathematical operations.

The machine houses its processors in more than 100 fridge-sized cabinets and together these weigh more than 155 tonnes.

Based in China's National Center for Supercomputing in the city of Tianjin, the computer has already started to do work for the local weather service and the National Offshore Oil Corporation.

Featured Post

Windows和Ubuntu双系统完全独立的安装方法

http://www.ubuntuhome.com/windows-and-ubuntu-install.html  | Ubuntu Home Posted by Snow on 2012/06/25 安装Windows和Ubuntu双系统时,很多人喜欢先安装windows,然...