1 / 3
Caption Text
2 / 3
Caption Two
3 / 3
Caption Three margin testing

Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts

Monday, August 29, 2011

Disney Inks Deal with Greenbox, Chinese eCommerce Is Taking Off

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/disney-inks-deal-with-greenbox-chinese-ecommerce-is-taking-off/2011/08/29/gIQAMffpmJ_story.html
 - The Washington Post

By TechCrunch.com, Monday, August 29, 3:37 AM

A lot of Americans desperately want to believe that China is full of poor people who can't innovate, and the only goods they make are cheap, toxic rip-offs our Western brands. They want to believe the only reason the Chinese economy is surging is because the West wants cheap goods and China knows how to make them that way.
These people will hate this post because it's about a company called Greenbox that flies in the face of those preconceived notions.
Greenbox makes high-end, super-styled kids clothes in and for the Chinese market. It caught the eye of Disney, which reached out to the company to ask if it wanted to manufacture some of their lines. "No thanks," the company replied. "We're not interested in just being an OEM."
Wait, isn't this China we're talking about? It's a country of OEMs.
The mouse house came back with a sweeter offer that's being announced at a ceremony in China tonight: It has licensed the rights for the princess collection, Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse and Winnie the Pooh to Greenbox. The company will design a high-end online collection to be sold online in China, as part of a broad plan to help build hype for the upcoming themepark in Shanghai.
Greenbox was founded more than ten years ago by a designer named Fangfang Wu who started to make clothes for her kids because she was so unhappy with the cheap, boring ones being sold in the country at the time. She obsessed over fabrics, fashion and design and a hobby quickly turned into a business, as she opened a chain of stores, and later closed those stores to sell on Taobao for better margins.
She was one of the top grossing sellers on Taobao as her designs struck a chord as with other young, working women in China who wanted to flaunt their increasingly hip and unique tastes. (I mean, look at that outfit above. It's like a little Chinese Natalie Wood playing Red Riding Hood. How is that not adorable?) In 2010, DCM's China office sought her out, investing just over $10 million to help scale the business.
Today Greenbox is bringing in about $50 million in annual revenues on decent margins. She charges between $30-$40 for items— not absurd, but certainly on the higher end for kids' clothes. "It's a classic case for venture capital: High gross margins, but takes money to build it to scale," says Hurst Lin of DCM.
Note I didn't describe Greenbox as the fill-in-the-blank of China. In fact, I'm hard-pressed to come up with an ecommerce model she's ripping off from the US. Kids clothes hasn't been a natural vertical for etailers here, save being an offshoot of a site like Amazon.
The reason Greenbox has worked so well for China is cultural. Because there are so many only children, there are at least six people wanting to lavish them with cute things: The parents, and two sets of grandparents. This was the same insight Tencent tapped into to monetize its virtual goods early on.
So, Greenbox: Not a copy cat, and not the invisible cheap assembly partner for the West either. Welcome to the next stage of Chinese entrepreneurship.
Greenbox is part of a crop of booming ecommerce companies in China. For years, the market has been held back due to the typical challenges of shipping, infrastructure and payment platforms. Jack Ma, of Alibaba, has long said ecommerce would be bigger in China than here, and that's not just because there are more people. In the US, he calls ecommerce "dessert," but in China there are so many people underserved by brick-and-mortar retail that ecommerce will be the "main course."
DCM and other firms have been aggressive backing many new ecommerce players, and they aren't as simple as just being the Amazon of China. (Although, to be fair, DCM backed one of those too.) Many of these companies, like Greenbox, show a sophistication in appealing to what the Chinese market wants, not simply what's worked elsewhere.
A surprising vertical Lin seized upon that has never proved lucrative in the US is wine. As incomes soar, many Chinese are developing a taste for Western wine, but have trouble finding interesting vintages and even navigating the language barriers, he says. His bet, YesMyWine, isn't just an ecommerce play, it's a content and media play.
He was delighted the PR contact on the call brought up another hot DCM ecommerce company: La Miu, which makes sexy lingerie. I could hear him squirming as he tried to explain– delicately– why Victoria's Secret failed miserably in China, while more recently La Miu has succeeded.
Victoria's Secret tried to market to women in their 30s who wanted to be comfortable not sexy. It was a bit too early in China's consumer revolution and husbands weren't demanding sexier underwear so ever-practical Chinese women just didn't see the appeal.
Victoria's Secret made another mistake that Lin tries to explain as tactfully as possible: Asian women have… different bodies….than Western women.
But La Miu has taken a totally different tact: Marketing underwear designed for the Asian body type to teens. "Born in the late 1990s they are much more a global consumer, they are open-minded and more rebellious," Lin says. "It's been a huge success."
As I've written before, China's ability to be the assembly line to the world wasn't where its role in the global economy ended; it was where it began. An ability to make products cheaper than anywhere else gave way to an ability to make high end products more nimbly than anywhere else. And increasingly, entrepreneurs like Wu are adding design and brand on top of that to create products the broader world will want.
The first generation of Chinese entrepreneurs was about picking the low-hanging fruit in a massive country just opening up to capitalism. Now the real fun is starting.
(Shameless plug: Join TechCrunch at Disrupt Beijing in October to learn more.)

Friday, August 26, 2011

苹果CEO史蒂夫·乔布斯辞职

http://www.williamlong.info/archives/2785.html
-月光博客

苹果董事会今天宣布,苹果CEO史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)辞职,董事会已任命前苹果COO蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)接任苹果CEO一职。乔布斯被选为董事会主席,库克将加入董事会,立即生效。
乔布斯今天向苹果董事会递交了辞呈,并强烈推荐前苹果COO蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)接任苹果CEO一职。
在乔布斯辞去苹果CEO的消息发布后,苹果股票在周三晚的盘后交易中暂停交易,在交易重启后苹果股价下跌6%,之后收复部分跌幅至5.2%,报356.30美元。
苹果CEO史蒂夫·乔布斯辞职
以下是辞职信全文:
致苹果董事会及苹果社区:
我曾经说过,如果有一天我不再能履行作为苹果CEO的职责和期望,我会是第一个告诉你们知道的人。不幸的是,这一天到来了。
在此,我宣布从苹果CEO的职位上辞职,如果董事会同意,我将担任苹果董事会主席。
针对接任者,我强烈建议执行我们制定的接任计划,提名蒂姆·库克为苹果CEO。
我相信,苹果的未来将更加光明,更具创造力。我期待未来苹果的成功,也将为此尽自己的绵薄之力。
我在苹果结交了一些人生中最好的朋友,能和你们所有人一起共事这么多年,非常感谢你们。
史蒂夫·乔布斯简历:
史蒂夫·乔布斯于1955年2月24日出生在美国旧金山。
1972年高中毕业后,在俄勒冈州波特兰市的里德学院只念了一学期的书。
1974年乔布斯在一家公司找到设计电脑游戏的工作。
1976年后,时年21岁的乔布斯和26岁的沃兹尼艾克在乔布斯家的车库里成立了苹果电脑公司。
1986年乔布斯买下了数字动画公司Pixar。这间公司如今已成为畅销动画电影《玩具总动员》和《虫虫危机》的制作厂商。
1996年,苹果公司重新雇佣乔布斯作为其兼职顾问。
1997年9月,乔布斯重返该公司任首席执行官。
2011年8月25日,乔布斯正式辞去苹果CEO职务。
史蒂夫·乔布斯荣誉:
1985年,乔布斯获得了由里根总统授予的国家级技术勋章;
1997年成为《时代周刊》的封面人物;同年被评为最成功的管理者,是声名显赫的"计算机狂人"。
2007年,史蒂夫·乔布斯被《财富》杂志评为了年度最伟大商人。
2009年被财富杂志评选为这十年美国最佳CEO,同年当选时代周刊年度风云人物之一。
来源:新浪科技编译
综述:乔布斯是美国最成功CEO之一,其辞职对于苹果来说令人遗憾。他的离开可能会对苹果的未来产生消极影响,苹果的发展在未来可能会有不确定性,这也是乔布斯辞职后苹果股价大幅下跌的一个原因。

Monday, May 9, 2011

Google I/O Kicks Off Tuesday: All Eyes On Android And New-Look Exec Team

http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-io-kicks-off-tuesday-all-eyes-on-android-and-new-look-exec-team/

Every major tech company in Silicon Valley takes at least one turn at San Francisco's Moscone Center each year to show off their latest ideas and reinforce their standing among the community. This week, Google (NSDQ: GOOG) gets a shot, likely to highlight versions of its Android software for phones, tablets, and televisions while continuing to push a vision of computing with the Web at its center.

Google I/O has grown significantly since 2008, with the fourth incarnation set to kick off Tuesday. Nearly 5,500 attendees are expected to pony up for access to Google's roster of engineers, who will present sessions on nearly everything Google, from search to Web application development to browsers to mobile applications. Here's a breakdown of what to expect:

See more of our latest Mobile coverage or add an alert for future coverage of Mobile.

Android: Google's most successful product outside of search, Android, will likely draw the most attention during the week. The smartphone version of Android has been a rousing success, but tablet versions have yet to create any serious alternative to Apple's iPad. It would be surprising if Google didn't address the tablet question in some detail, either through new operating system versions or applications.

Google TV: One version of Android that hasn't really taken flight—Google TV—has been reported as worthy of an Google I/O slot. First introduced a year ago at this conference and launched last November, Google TV has faced opposition from the big network television companies and confusion among customers who encounter its remote controls. A preview of a next-generation version is expected, but enthusiasm for the concept in general is not strong leading into the show.

Chrome OS: Netbooks bearing Google's browser-centric operating system were supposed to have been launched last year, but delays forced the project into a mid-2011 launch schedule. Now that it's May 2011, presumably Google is ready to shed more light on exactly what types of Chrome OS netbooks will launch, and how much they will cost. It will also be interesting to see if Google talks up Chrome OS tablet-style devices, given that interest in the netbook has waned considerably since Chrome OS was first announced in 2009.

Web Standards: Google has used significant air time at the previous Google I/O conferences to urge adoption of HTML5 technologies as the pathway to a next-generation model of computing centered on the Web. This is still very much a work in progress. Expect Google to continue the evangelical call this week, with demonstrations of the types of sophisticated Web applications that are possible with HTML5 technologies.

Wild Cards: Some form of a Google music locker is inevitable, but has the company locked down enough of the details with the music industry for it to surface this week? Will Google Docs finally get offline access? Which Android tablet will Google give away to attendees, the Xoom or the Galaxy Tab?

Context: Google is a company that famously likes to celebrate its failures. That means Google I/O is probably its most celebratory week of each year, considering it has produced such notable failures asGoogle Wave and Google Friend Connect. As pointed out over the course of the weekend, Google doesn't necessarily save some of its most winning ideas for Google I/O: Google Instant was announced at its own event last September, for example.

However, this is the first Google I/O with Larry Page back at the helm of the company, and therefore the first chance for him to really put his stamp on the show. Google has been furiously reorganizing its executive ranks in the weeks since Page has taken over, and this Google I/O may give hints as to the new pecking order at Google with respect to the types of projects demonstrated at the show, and the people chosen to pitch those projects to the world.

It's a week in which all eyes will be on the company that dominates Web search, fumbles with social skills, and provides a defensible alternative to Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) in the mobile market. We'll be at Google I/O both days, and will bring you highlights and analysis of Google's week in the spotlight.

We'll be addressing some of these themes during our next conference, paidContent Mobile, May 18 in New York City. You can find out more about the agenda and register here.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

中国和美国的互联网差异

http://www.williamlong.info/archives/2647.html
-月光博客

  美国人发明了一个改变世界的工具,就是互联网。互联网商业化之后,美国人在它的基础上创造了一个又一个企业营利模式的奇迹;中国互联网从完全抄袭美国模式到自己寻找真正合适的生存方式,也在不断探索发展。中国和美国的互联网,在趋同与存异的差异化中,究竟形成了哪些不同?又是什么力量在起作用?不作比较,不知道世界如此不同。

  可以说,现在的世界上有两个超级大国:中国和美国。在互联网以指数的速度发展的今天,人们的生活已经离不开网络,那么,这两个大国在互联网方面有什么差异呢?我们从下面一系列与互联网相关的参数来比较两个国家,比如:互联网用户数量,互联网普及率,互联网连接的速度,域名数量,受欢迎的网站,网页浏览器,操作系统等等。

中美互联网

  1、互联网用户数量

  十年前,美国是世界上的互联网头号大国,而现在很明显已经不是,取而代之的是中国。下图是中美网民的数量(PS:这其中的最大原因就是中国的人口数量了)

互联网用户数量

  当然,中美两个国家的网民数量占整个世界的31%,其中中国在亚洲的比例是51%。

  2、互联网普及率

  相比中国来说,美国的互联网普及率要高很多,一般的普通公民都能利用到互联网。

互联网普及率

  但是,中国在这方面的增长空间要远远高于美国。假如中国的互联网普及率达到与美果相当的水平,那么,中国的网民应该可以超过10亿了。

  3、互联网增长速率

  提及互联网的增长速率,对中国来说,在2000年至2010年之间的增长速率是1767%,这个速度的确是令人难以想象的。在此期间,美国只在原基础上增长了一倍。当然,很明显的一点,就是美国在10年前的互联网水平相比其他国家来说已经算是比较高的了。然而,中国当时还是比较落后的国家,所以增长的空间比较大也是可以接受的。

互联网增长速率

  在这一点上,我们可以回顾一下过去的数据。在2000年的时候美国有95,000,000网民,在2010年为239,000,000.另一方面,中国在此期间的网民数量由22,000,000增长到420,000,000.对比这两个数字相信就知道差别了吧。

  4、因特网接入速度

  在这一方面,美国就远远超出中国了。在美国的互联网接入平均速度基本上是中国的5倍,美国基本上的网络接入都是用宽带接入。

因特网接入速度

  造成这种差别的原因很清楚,当你看到网络连接连接速度是如何分布的(如下图)。在美国,34%的互联网连接速度超过5 Mbit /秒,而在中国,只有0.4%达到这一速度。

网络链接速度

  5、网络服务器

  服务器是提供网络信息的终端,在这一方面,美国也远远超出中国。者也很能接受,因为在互联网的初期,美国救援预案超出中国,而且服务器技术在美国也会比中国好,导致有些不在美国本土的人也把自己的服务器放在美国。原因当然是美国的互联网技术比较领先了。

网络服务器

  上图是由CIA提供的数据,显而易见得是:美国几乎提供比中国多28倍的网络服务器。我们不知道这些数据时怎样得到的,但是已经能从一方面反应两国之间在网络拂去其方面的差异了。

  6、主流搜索引擎

  Google在中国的搜索领域一直没有达到过称霸的地位,而且在去年Google撤出中国后,Google在中国的搜索份额更是下跌。中国的中文搜索引擎一直 是以百度称帝的。两国的主流搜索引擎为;

  7、顶级网站

  美国的顶级互联网网站在全世界都是比较出名的,但是,精心的人一定会发现,中国的顶级网站一般在世界上不是那么出名,或者说并没有很多人会去使用。

  美国网站TOP 5

  1. Google.com
  2. Facebook.com
  3. Yahoo.com
  4. Youtube.com
  5. Amazon.com

  中国网站TOP5

  1. Baidu.com (search engine)
  2. QQ.com (online community)
  3. Sina.com.cn (web portal)
  4. Taobao.com ("China's eBay")
  5. Google.com.hk (Google Hong Kong)

  当然,Facebook在中国已经上不了了,google.cn也撤出中国而转向了google.com.hk,但是google.com.hk在中国任然占有很大的比重,至少还能够跃居前五。

  8、主流的网络浏览器

  在中国,大部分的网民依然使用的是IE6.0浏览器(这一点也许让人匪夷所思),因为有那么多的好的免费浏览器(如高版本的 IE, Firefox 或者 Chrome等)。这其中的很大一部分原因就是,中国网民在安装操作系统的时候,微软会在操作系统里面自动安装IE6.0,尤其是使用所谓"Windows XP系统的用户",使用IE6.0就更常见了。

  美国排前五名的浏览器:

  1. Internet Explorer, 47.5%
  2. Firefox, 25.5%
  3. Chrome, 14.6%
  4. Safari, 11.2%
  5. Opera, 0.6%

  中国排前五名的浏览器:

  1. Internet Explorer, 87.4%
  2. Chrome, 4.4%
  3. Maxthon, 3.8%
  4. Firefox, 3.3%
  5. Safari, 0.6%

  主流浏览器版本:

  • 美国: Internet Explorer 8.0, 33.9%
  • 中国: Internet Explorer 6.0, 41.1%

  9、主流操作系统

  在美国,Windows 7基本上已经取代Windows XP,但是在中国是截然不同的。中国的网民大多数还是使用Windows XP,这个比例基本上是4/5。

  美国排前五的主流操作系统:

  1. Windows 7, 32.1%
  2. Windows XP, 31.1%
  3. Windows Vista, 19.1%
  4. Mac OS X, 14.9%
  5. iOS (iPad), 1.2%(统计不包括iPhone和iPod Touch上的iOS )

  中国排前五名的主流操作系统:

  1. Windows XP, 82.2%
  2. Windows 7, 13.8%
  3. Windows Vista, 2.7%
  4. Mac OS X, 0.5%
  5. Windows 2003, 0.3%

  当然,值得一提的是,上面的统计数据时根据接入网络的用户而来的,还有一些没有接入网络的就不在统计之内了。

  10、域名

  对域名数量的统计通常按域名的购买地而非购买人所在地进行分类。由于互联网用户热衷于在美国注册域名,因此美国的域名数量会超出实际数量。

  记住这一点,然后我们来看两国的顶级域名数量。

域名数量

  然后是国家码顶级域名,.us表示美国,.cn表示中国。这里需要注意的是,.us在美国的受欢迎程度并不十分高,.com是使用最多的顶级域名,这使.us的推广在一定程度上受到了阻碍。

域名

  11、全球化的攻击流量

  所谓"攻击流量",是指自然界的恶意流量,例如试图获得通过各种方式非法访问到计算机的端口,利用操作系统中的薄弱环节攻击计算机,这包括所谓的端口扫描以发现潜在的计算机漏洞。美国的交通部曾经有被攻击过的"美誉"。这方面中国是第三(仅次于俄罗斯)。

全球化的攻击流量

  结语

  那么,从上面的各方面的对比中,我们可以得到如下的结论:

  1、 中国的互联网用户群的基数很大,更大(是美国的大约1.76倍)。

  2、美国互联网基础设施远远领先于中国的,至少对终端用户来说是如此。

  3、中国在互联网方面有更大的发展潜力。

  4、中国的互联网用户运行的软件版本比美国互联网用户落后,至少在操作系统和网络浏览器方面。

  5、美国互联网行业继续领先世界,特别是因为世界各国因特网用户都需要使用其互联网服务。 (也许有人可能会问,这种情况会将持续多久呢?也许这也是一个值得探讨的问题吧。)

  总的看来,美国在互联网科技及其服务技术领域远远超出中国,但是,单纯就网民数量来讲,还是中国人较多,并且这种状况在将来一段时间内会维持下去。当然,中国的互联网领域发展空间很大,毕竟以后上网的人越来越多,对于网络的开发前景还是可观的。

  幸好,我们的世界不会再2012年终结,我们可以看看以后的格局会是怎样的一个变化呢?当我们时隔多年再回头看看这篇文章以及文章中提及的状况,会不会有所改变呢?美国还会依旧是互联网领域的老大吗?中国这个发展迅速的国家会在互联网领域崛起吗?我们拭目以待。

  英文原文:USA vs. China on the Internet

  中文翻译:晨露博客

Monday, May 2, 2011

Bin Laden death sends Internet traffic soaring

http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/02/technology/osama_bin_laden_internet_traffic/?section=money_latest
- May. 2, 2011

Google: Google Trends ranked the keywords "osama bin laden dead" as "volcanic," the highest level it assigns for a trending topic.

Sunday was not the first time that the term "osama bin laden dead" peaked on Google (GOOG, Fortune 500). On Sept. 24, 2006, a French newspaperl'Est Republicain reported a story supposedly based on leaked Saudi intelligence documents that said bin Laden had been killed a month earlier. The CIA and French governments quickly denounced that report as false.

Google Insights for Search ranked that 2006 story as the biggest search event for bin Laden, but the tool has not updated yet with Sunday's data.

News sites: The bin Laden story resulted in a peak of more than 4.1 million page views per second on the news websites supported and tracked by content delivery network Akamai (AKAM). Akamai delivers about 20% of the Internet's content, and it supports popular news sites like nytimes.com, reuters.com, bbc.com and usatoday.com.

The peak occurred at about 11:30 p.m. ET on Sunday, right as President Obama's news conference began. Just an hour before the news broke, there were roughly 2.5 million page views per second on those pages.

Despite the unusually high volume of traffic, Akamai said it did not rank in the company's top 10 news events for highest page-view peaks.

The largest peak in Internet traffic came at noon on June 24, 2010, when there were simultaneous World Cup qualifying matches as well as the longest-ever Wimbledon match -- all being played at the same time. Those events resulted in a peak of 10.4 million page views per second on the news sites Akamai supports.

Last week's royal wedding ranked sixth on Akamai's list, with more than 5 million page views per second. It was the second-highest non-sports-related Internet event, right behind the 2010 U.S. mid-term elections.

All of the largest peaks in the top 13 were from events that occurred in 2010 or 2011 -- which is unsurprising, since Internet usage continues to rise globally. But ranking at No. 14 is the election of President Obama, which occurred in November 2008.

The biggest Internet spikes tend to overwhelm servers and rendered some websites unresponsive. News of Michael Jackson's death famously brought down Google News, TMZ.com, latimes.com and even AOL Instant Messenger, thanks to high traffic demands. To top of page

Friday, April 1, 2011

Shocker from Redmond: Microsoft turns to Linux

http://www.infoworld.com/t/misadventures/shocker-redmond-microsoft-turns-linux-020
April 01, 2011

Based on Ubuntu, the company's homegrown 'Winux' distribution will run native Windows applications through emulation


Microsoft has ceased development of the Windows operating system and will be releasing its own Linux distribution, the company revealed in an SEC filing yesterday.

The annual 10-K report disclosed plans for the development of the "Winux" operating system and detailed special costs related to terminating the Windows business -- including costs associated with supporting current versions of Windows through 2020.

The move signals that Windows -- once the world's most popular operating systems -- is no longer strategically important to Microsoft. Company officials acknowledged that switching to Linux will result in significant cost savings without compromising performance, scalability, reliability, or security. Further, compatibility with most Windows applications will be maintained, the officials said.

In a call with reporters, Steven Sinofsky, president of the Windows and Windows Live division at Microsoft, downplayed the significance to customers.

"It's not a big deal," Sinofsky said. "Most Windows users won't even know the difference."

Sinofsky explained that, although Winux is based on Linux, it would run native Windows applications using an emulation layer that Microsoft is developing. Although emulation introduces additional software overhead, Sinofsky said any performance differences would be "imperceptible" on today's hardware.

"The user experience will be nearly identical [to running Windows] today," Sinofsky emphasized. "The GUI will be the same. Performance will be the same. Security will be better."

Sinofsky declined to provide a timeframe for the Winux release or indicate what the licensing terms would be. He confirmed that Microsoft would continue to maintain Windows at least through 2020.

Departing Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer [link to Ted's Ballmer bumped story ] said in an interview with CNBC earlier today that the switch to Linux would deliver huge cost savings and put Microsoft in a better position to compete against Apple and Google in consumer and mobile technologies, as well as Oracle and IBM in business computing.

"The operating system is no longer the key to winning in the technology business," Ballmer said. At the same time, Ballmer noted that the demise of Windows saddened him personally. Ballmer said he planned to devote much of his time during retirement to helping Windows users. He had created a weblog of Windows tips and technical advice, called My Windows Pony, that will soon be re-introduced as My Winux Pony.

Doug Dineley is executive editor of the InfoWorld Test Center.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

China claims supercomputer crown

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11644252
28 October 2010 Last updated at 11:14 ET BBC News

Tianhe supercomputer, Nvidia

The Tianhe-1A supercomputer is about 50% faster than its closest rival.

China has claimed the top spot on the list of the world's supercomputers.

The title has gone to China's Tianhe-1A supercomputer that is capable of carrying out more than 2.5 thousand trillion calculations a second.

To reach such high speeds the machine draws on more than 7,000 graphics processors and 14,000 Intel chips.

The claim to be the fastest machine on the planet has been ratified by the Top 500 Organisation which maintains a list of the most powerful machines.

High power

China's Tianhe-1A (Milky Way) has taken over the top spot from America's XT5 Jaguar at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee that can carry out only 1.75 petaflops per second. One petaflop is the equivalent of 1,000 trillion calculations per second.

The news about the machine broke just before the publication of the biennial Top 500 Supercomputer list which ranks the world's most powerful machines.

Prof Jack Dongarra from the University of Tennessee, one of the computer scientists who helps to compile the list, said China's claim was legitimate.

"This is all true," he told BBC News. "I was in China last week and talked with the designers, saw the system, and verified the results."

He added: "I would say it's 47% faster than the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's machine, 1.7 Pflops (ORNL system) to 2.5 Pflops (Chinese system)."

Tianhe-1A is unusual in that it unites thousands of Intel processors with thousands of graphics cards made by Nvidia.

The chips inside graphics cards are typically made up of small arithmetical units that can carry out simple sums very quickly. By contrast, Intel chips are typically used to carry out more complicated mathematical operations.

The machine houses its processors in more than 100 fridge-sized cabinets and together these weigh more than 155 tonnes.

Based in China's National Center for Supercomputing in the city of Tianjin, the computer has already started to do work for the local weather service and the National Offshore Oil Corporation.

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Google's new robot car: Crazy good or crazy crazy?

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20019139-71.html

There is something charming about engineers who decide they will alter the world. Just because they can.


So Google's announcement that it has already been testing cars that drive themselves should be met by warm feelings in many of one's more imaginative nerve-endings.


As I grasp this vastly ambitious project, Google is intending that these cars, manned as they are by vast arrays of excellent soft- and hardware, will avoid crashes and allow for fuel savings and more cars on the road (as, deductive reasoning goes, there will be no crashes). They will also allow drivers to get drunk to skunk levels, given that no self-respecting Google car would actually let the drivers take the wheel, even when they're sober.


While several parts of me want to emit songs from the works of the finest gospel authors, there are other parts that yield a B-flat of discomfort.


I am not one of those who whines that Google shouldn't dare develop such a car because there is no obvious route to profit. This is quite clearly R&D set to the rhythm of R&B. Google is reaching for the soul within its copious brains.


One problem, though, lies in what lies within that soul.

Soon we will all be driving them. Or will they all be driving us? (Real picture, by the way. Marin County, Calif.)

(Credit: Chris Matyszczyk/CNET)

I have the troubling impression that these robot cars will only be efficacious if everyone is driving them. After all, you could have lots of fine responsible people from Marin County, Calif., smugly pottering about in their Googlized Priuses, and still some wayward tourist in a hire car or some manic depressive in a Pontiac could ram them up the back, causing misery and injury in equal measure.


So if everyone needs to get a Googlized Prius, this would seem to feed quite handily into Google's implicit brand trait of wanting everyone to be clutched tightly to its bosom. Which is not so much communist, as just plain dull.


And I am attempting to ignore the fact that Google could, indeed, with all its fine GPS sensorship, track you along every inch of your route. It could also send you nice ads on your laptop or GPS screen, as you'll have all your attentive abilities at the company's full disposal.


The second slight niggle feels even more uncomfortable and therefore even more fundamental. For it concerns the fun part of driving. While some have conjectured that if you don't have to drive your car, you can therefore have more time to search Google for pottery or pornography, I am concerned that your Googlized Prius removes your ability to, well, drive.


Google has declared that these cars can be programmed to drive cautiously or a little more aggressively. But the whole point of driving is that it is not programmed. Sometimes, you just want to put your foot on the gas, waft past the people carrier full of sightseers or pot smokers, and, perhaps, even waft past the speed limit.

One presumes that this might be a little more difficult if your car has to be programmed. And, of course, if your car has to be a Prius.


One can, of course, admire the sheer insane audacity of wresting the steering wheel away from such characters as the Mazda SUV driver who flashed his headlights at me in the outside lane last week and offered me several mouthfuls of breakfast when I seemed to be reluctant. (There were solid white lines either side of me. And, well, did I mention he was driving a Mazda SUV?)


But surely the most important piece of engineering that one's Googlized Prius would require would be the manual override. I mean, we're not really supposed to trust our brains, our enjoyment, AND our lives to Google's software, are we? Wouldn't that be just a little too much?


Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20019139-71.html#ixzz11ytz8ibQ

Featured Post

Windows和Ubuntu双系统完全独立的安装方法

http://www.ubuntuhome.com/windows-and-ubuntu-install.html  | Ubuntu Home Posted by Snow on 2012/06/25 安装Windows和Ubuntu双系统时,很多人喜欢先安装windows,然...